Canada's online magazine: Politics, entertainment, technology, media, arts, books: backofthebook.ca

Politics, tech, media, culture and more, from a Canadian point-of-view

  • Politics
  • Media
  • Culture
  • Science and Tech
  • Living
  • Arts and Books
  • Features
  • The Video
You are here: Home / Science and Tech / Be Your Own Robin Hood

Be Your Own Robin Hood

03/25/2007 by backofthebook.ca

Recently Slashdot posted a story about the RIAA suing a disabled man living on social security. For the most part, the Slashdot crowd is rabidly anti-RIAA, but one fellow commented that just because a person is disabled, it doesn’t mean that he can’t infringe copyright. I found this defense of the RIAA vs. a poor, disabled guy somewhat disgusting. Even if he was guilty as charged, I’m still very much on his side and against the RIAA.

Is it okay for the RIAA to “sue ’em all,” even the weakest members of society? Their latest atrocity is an attempt to get a child to testify against her own mother (also a disabled person living on disability). But the law is the law, it makes no distinction beyond culpability. If the weakest amongst us are infringing copyright, then technically their weakness is no defense.

Or is it? Whatever happened to the social contract? At what point did we say that collective revulsion for persecution of the weak by the powerful must take a back seat to corporate interest? At what point do we simply acknowledge that democracy has fallen to corporatism and that the social contract has been trumped by End User Licensing Agreements, and the latest rationalization of copyright?

I say the “latest rationalization of copyright,” because the original idea of creative works being public property to which the creator has been given a temporary monopoly seems increasingly remote. Now we are to consider creative works to be “intellectual property” belonging to the creator or, more often, whatever corporation secured the rights from the original creator by whatever means — in the case of the music industry often by contracts most advantageous to themselves. And in the US, whenever Mickey Mouse is on the verge of falling into the public domain, you may expect the term of copyright to be extended. The US Constitution dictates the term be limited (Article I, Section 8, Clause 8), but does not specify a duration, so there is nothing to stop Congress from extending it indefinitely.

Along with the idea of “intellectual property” comes the idea that this “property” can be “stolen,” just as actual property can be stolen. The term “piracy” has been successfully applied to such, even though there are significant differences between copyright infringement and theft on the high seas, or, indeed, theft of any kind. Theft involves depriving a thing’s rightful owner of the possession and use of said thing. Making a copy of a thing in no way impairs the owner’s use or possession. Indeed, this kind of sharing would be a wonderful thing for children encouraged to share a toy — imagine if they could simply hand over a copy of it! But contrary to what your mother may have taught you, the RIAA would like you to believe that sharing is a crime.

It seems to me that the last great evil to be acknowledged as such is socio-economic inequality. Slavery has been abolished, civil rights championed, women emancipated, and in many jurisdictions homosexuals are making progress towards equal rights. There’s still work to do in all these areas, but our tolerance of socio-economic inequality reminds me of writings from the 19th-century, where otherwise decent people made blatantly racist or anti-semitic statements as a matter of course because such was the common attitude of the time.

For those of us with few resources, p2p file sharing can be regarded as DIY Robin Hoodism, with a modern twist. Instead of stealing from the rich to give to the poor, the poor can simply share copies of files the rich claim rights to. If the rich complain because they don’t think they’re rich enough without the money they feel the poor should be paying, then screw them. The social contract is breaking down, and the serfs owe only as much obedience as Prince John can enforce. Just be aware that poaching on royal lands can be risky.

For those us with money to spend on music, do not support EMI, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group or other RIAA member labels. If in doubt, check riaaradar.com, and know that the rumours of allofmp3.com‘s demise have been greatly exagerated. You can also keep more money in your own pockets and out of the labels’ pockets by buying second hand. In a corporatist world, the votes you cast with your wallet may matter more than those cast with a ballot.

Filed Under: Science and Tech Tagged With: copyright, intellectual property, internet, p2p, piracy, RIAA

Subscribe to BoB by e-mail or RSS
Google+
  • Living
  • Politics
  • Media
  • Culture
  • Arts and Books
  • Features
  • The Video
Fire sale sign

Fort McMurray: Shopping time!

By Brady Tighe We’re now officially in the aftermath phase of the northern Alberta wildfire crisis. The fire is long gone, and everyone with a home to return to is back in its … [Read More...]

Nathan Cullen

Electoral reform: Hashtag fresh thinking

By Alison@Creekside The most interesting and innovative idea to come out of the first meeting of the all-party Special Committee on Electoral Reform, or ERRE, was Nathan Cullen's suggestion, … [Read More...]

Trudeau on quantum computing

The Trudeau gush fest is getting old

By Jim Henshaw There have been several bewildered as well as angry accounts coming out of the USA lately about how little media time has been spent covering the Democratic Presidential Primary … [Read More...]

Rick Meyers in Nanaimo Pride Parade

My friend, Rick, at the Pride Parade

By Frank Moher On this dreadful day, I don't want to write about the shootings in Orlando. I want to write about my friend, Rick. Rick lives just outside of Nanaimo, a city of about 80,000, … [Read More...]

Stephen Colbert on Late Night set

Triumph of the drama nerds

By Frank Moher Two drama nerds have recently moved into high profile positions. Before I name them (or perhaps you’ve already guessed who they are; or perhaps you’d like to scroll down and look at … [Read More...]

From “Our Rape Blog”: Shooting the Moon

Originally published on Our Rape Blog, the author's account of the aftermath of a violent sexual assault. By Mary Fraughton Have you ever played Hearts? It’s a card game. For our purposes, … [Read More...]

First Nations defending Lelu Island

The video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”

From Creekside: The B.C. provincial government is trying to green light the construction of a massive LNG terminal on Lelu Island in the Skeena Estuary -- Pacific Northwest LNG, backed by Malaysian … [Read More...]

Google

Follow Us!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

RSS CBC News



Recent Posts

  • Fort McMurray: Shopping time!
  • From “Our Rape Blog”: Shooting the Moon
  • Electoral reform: Hashtag fresh thinking
  • The fish hotel
  • Hatred on an Alberta golf course
  • The video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”
  • My friend, Rick, at the Pride Parade
  • Our selective sympathy
  • The Water Bomber, The Frogman and The Great Canadian Novelist
  • Komagata Maru: The story behind the apology

Tags

9/11 Afghanistan Alberta bad behaviour books British Columbia business Canada Canadian military Canadian politics CBC celebrity computers Conservatives crime environment family film G20 Globe and Mail internet Jason Kenney journalism Justin Trudeau law Liberals Maclean's music National Post NDP newspapers oil sands online media Ontario Quebec RCMP religion sports Stephen Harper television theatre Toronto U.S. Vancouver women

Archives

The Video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”

Pages

  • About
  • Privacy

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in