Canada's online magazine: Politics, entertainment, technology, media, arts, books: backofthebook.ca

Politics, tech, media, culture and more, from a Canadian point-of-view

  • Politics
  • Media
  • Culture
  • Science and Tech
  • Living
  • Arts and Books
  • Features
  • The Video
You are here: Home / Politics / Saucy Senate should learn its place

Saucy Senate should learn its place

07/03/2013 by backofthebook.ca 1 Comment

The Canadian SenateBy David@Sixthestate.net

I’m intrigued by the battle lines drawn over the Senate’s recent decision to reject a terrible and churlish piece of legislation which would attempt to impose an improper and hypocritical set of financial disclosure regulations onto unions — only unions — that don’t apply to charities, corporations, political parties, or even the government itself. A great number of people commenced exulting over the decision of the Senate to stand up to Harper.

This is wrong, friends. Terribly wrong. An unelected body should only reject legislation which is clearly out of order, unconstitutional, or so far beyond the pale of normal democratic and scientifically informed modern society that it is obviously unthinkable. This bill, offensive as many of us may find it, was probably none of those things. The cheeky way in which the Senate did this actually makes it worse — catapulting it back to the House of Commons with a saucy amendment raising the disclosure limits to the same absurdly loose ones that the Harper government recently proposed to impose on itself via its appalling hatchet job on now-independent MP Brent Rathgeber’s private member’s bill.

Those who think this is good news should consider what happens in three years when, if the present polls are any indication, Stephen Harper’s Conservatives will be on the opposition benches in the House of Commons, while Harper-appointed Senators will form the balance of power in the Senate. Do you suppose it would be any more appropriate if Harper’s Conservative Senators blocked a Liberal or NDP government bill that Conservatives found unsettling? They could do so, just the same way they blocked the union bill.

Ah, say Conservatives (and intelligent commentators): we can solve this problem. If the Senate wants to behave like proper legislators, then make them proper legislators, says Andrew Coyne. By that, he means: make them elected.

But this is even worse. As matters stand, the Senate and the House of Commons are officially equal, but the Senate is supposed to defer to the House of Commons because the Commons is democratically elected. (On the union bill, the Senate refused to defer.) If both the Senate and the Commons are elected, then they will be officially equal, period. There will be no reason for the Senate to defer to the Commons.

In which case, it is a certainty that sooner or later (but probably sooner), you will have a situation where one party holds the balance of power in the House of Commons, while a second party holds a balance in the Senate. When that happens, who shall form the government? More importantly, what happens when legislative gridlock results?

There are two solutions to that problem. In the American system, legislative gridlock happens all the time. But the President sits above the legislative houses. His job is assured, regardless of what happens in the parliament. In the absence of new legislation, the President can carry on most of the business of the country through regulations.

But in the Canadian system, the prime minister must have a seat in the Parliament, and his government must have the confidence of the chamber, or his government must resign. Except that if you make both the Senate and the Commons equal and elected, that can’t happen. What happens when the Prime Minister wins the confidence of one chamber, but not of the other one? What if one chamber demands his resignation, and the other doesn’t?

It’s alarming that the Harper government didn’t even begin to consider these questions when they tabled their preposterous proposal for a banana-republic-style “electoral” system for the Senate. That makes me think they weren’t serious about seeing it pass anyways. But the point is, such legislation must not pass. If the Senate were going to block any bill, it would be that one. (But it’s never come to them, so the point is moot.)

Filed Under: Politics Tagged With: Bill c-377, Brent Rathgeber, Canada, Canadian House of Commons, Canadian Parliament, Canadian Senate, Conservatives, Senate reform, unions

Subscribe to BoB by e-mail or RSS

Comments

  1. Fyoder Larue says

    07/04/2013 at 3:41 pm

    Personally, I like the idea of an equal, unelected second house to act as a check on the elected one. Appointments may be politically motivated, but after that, there’s no obligation to senators to vote with their party. The commons may be elected, but that doesn’t mean that in actual fact they represent their constituents interests — they are expected to vote on party lines. It’s effectively an elected dictatorship where the only real democratic element is that we can replace it with another every four years or so. A better method of selection for the Senate would be at random from the population of adults 40+ who have a university degree. Less good, but still kind of random, would be by accident of birth — a hereditary House of Lords.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Google+
  • Living
  • Politics
  • Media
  • Culture
  • Arts and Books
  • Features
  • The Video
Fire sale sign

Fort McMurray: Shopping time!

By Brady Tighe We’re now officially in the aftermath phase of the northern Alberta wildfire crisis. The fire is long gone, and everyone with a home to return to is back in its … [Read More...]

Nathan Cullen

Electoral reform: Hashtag fresh thinking

By Alison@Creekside The most interesting and innovative idea to come out of the first meeting of the all-party Special Committee on Electoral Reform, or ERRE, was Nathan Cullen's suggestion, … [Read More...]

Trudeau on quantum computing

The Trudeau gush fest is getting old

By Jim Henshaw There have been several bewildered as well as angry accounts coming out of the USA lately about how little media time has been spent covering the Democratic Presidential Primary … [Read More...]

Rick Meyers in Nanaimo Pride Parade

My friend, Rick, at the Pride Parade

By Frank Moher On this dreadful day, I don't want to write about the shootings in Orlando. I want to write about my friend, Rick. Rick lives just outside of Nanaimo, a city of about 80,000, … [Read More...]

Stephen Colbert on Late Night set

Triumph of the drama nerds

By Frank Moher Two drama nerds have recently moved into high profile positions. Before I name them (or perhaps you’ve already guessed who they are; or perhaps you’d like to scroll down and look at … [Read More...]

From “Our Rape Blog”: Shooting the Moon

Originally published on Our Rape Blog, the author's account of the aftermath of a violent sexual assault. By Mary Fraughton Have you ever played Hearts? It’s a card game. For our purposes, … [Read More...]

First Nations defending Lelu Island

The video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”

From Creekside: The B.C. provincial government is trying to green light the construction of a massive LNG terminal on Lelu Island in the Skeena Estuary -- Pacific Northwest LNG, backed by Malaysian … [Read More...]

Google

Follow Us!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

RSS CBC News



Recent Posts

  • Fort McMurray: Shopping time!
  • From “Our Rape Blog”: Shooting the Moon
  • Electoral reform: Hashtag fresh thinking
  • The fish hotel
  • Hatred on an Alberta golf course
  • The video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”
  • My friend, Rick, at the Pride Parade
  • Our selective sympathy
  • The Water Bomber, The Frogman and The Great Canadian Novelist
  • Komagata Maru: The story behind the apology

Tags

9/11 Afghanistan Alberta bad behaviour books British Columbia business Canada Canadian military Canadian politics CBC celebrity computers Conservatives crime environment family film G20 Globe and Mail internet Jason Kenney journalism Justin Trudeau law Liberals Maclean's music National Post NDP newspapers oil sands online media Ontario Quebec RCMP religion sports Stephen Harper television theatre Toronto U.S. Vancouver women

Archives

The Video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”

Pages

  • About
  • Privacy

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in