By Alison@Creekside
An enthusiastic supporter of the Beijing Olympics who posted his photos online at Flickr under a creative commons licence – which allows anyone to use them for free with attribution – received a cease and desist letter from International Olympic Committee lawyers:
“Images of the Games taken by you may not be used for any purposes other than private, which does not include licensing of the pictures to third parties …
“In addition, please be advised that the Olympic identifications such as the Olympic rings, the emblems and mascots of the Olympic Games, the word `Olympic’ and images of the Olympic Games belong to the IOC and cannot be used without its prior written consent.”
Even the “O” word can’t be used now without prior written IOC consent?
I knew words like “winter” and “gold” and “Vancouver” were off-limits — but, somewhat inconsistently, not words like: boondoggle, evictions, SROs, homelessness, or cost over-runs.
Very well, have it your way. “Owelympics” it is then from now on.
Out here in BC at Owelympics Central, we’ve moved up from criminalizing 2010 Five Ring Circus protest in public places and stalking nursing students on campus who happen to know somebody who doesn’t support the Owelympics.
Now the BC government wants to remove signs and graffiti from inside your home even without your consent: (h/t Waterbaby by email for Bill 13):
Bill 13 Part 9 – Enforcement of bylaws in relation to signs
32 (1) Subject to this section and section 34, an officer or employee of a specified municipality [Vancouver, Richmond, Whistler] or a person authorized by the council of a specified municipality has the authority to enter on property, and to enter into property, without the consent of the owner or occupier for the purpose of enforcing, in accordance with subsection (4), the specified municipality’s bylaws in relation to signs.
(2) Except in the case of a significant risk to the health or safety of persons or property, a person
(a) may only exercise the authority in subsection (1) at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, and
(b) must take reasonable steps to advise the owner or occupier before entering the property.
Now note the following wording : “if any of the following applies”
(3) A person may only exercise the authority in subsection (1) to enter into a place that is occupied as a private dwelling if any of the following applies:
(a) the occupier consents;
(b) the specified municipality has given the occupier at least 24 hours’ written notice of the entry and the reasons for it;
(c) the entry is made under the authority of a warrant under this or another Act;
(d) the person exercising the authority has reasonable grounds for believing that failure to enter may result in a significant risk to the health or safety of the occupier or other persons.(4) A person who has entered on property, or entered into property, in accordance with this section has the authority to enforce the specified municipality’s bylaws in relation to signs by removing, covering or altering the sign that is in contravention of these bylaws.
Ditto for “graffiti”, covered in section 33.
(34) The powers in sections 32 and 33 may be exercised only during the period of February 1, 2010 to March 31, 2010.
CBC: “City officials have said the law is intended to clamp down on so-called ambush marketing, and it includes an exception for celebratory signs, which are defined as those that celebrate the 2010 Winter Games and create or add to the festive atmosphere.”
For the rest of us “uncelebratory” types, there’s the prospect of a $10,000-a-day fine and six months in jail if we don’t keep our little heads down from Feb 1 to March 31.
And if, as spun by city officials, they were only worried about “businesses trying to exploit the games logo,” why also make a separate provision for busting graffiti?
Answering questions about Olympic security back in June, city manager Penny Ballem told the Vancouver council. “The city has no accountability in terms of the role and policies of the 2010 Integrated Security Unit. We are only able to ask questions.”
A week ago I heard BC Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General Kash Heed give the same excuse on CBC radio about the stalking of the nursing student : “There’s nothing we can do. It’s a global thing,” he said.
Fun fact: Two of the RCMP who presided over the tasering and killing of Robert Dziekanski at Vancouver airport two years ago – Monty Robinson and Bill Bentley – have been reassigned to Owelympic detail.
Leave a Reply