Canada's online magazine: Politics, entertainment, technology, media, arts, books: backofthebook.ca

Politics, tech, media, culture and more, from a Canadian point-of-view

  • Politics
  • Media
  • Culture
  • Science and Tech
  • Living
  • Arts and Books
  • Features
  • The Video
You are here: Home / Media / White wash

White wash

10/16/2008 by backofthebook.ca

By Frank Moher

The various human rights commissions that rejected the complaint against Maclean’s magazine — most recently the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal — were right to do so, of course. Members of the Canadian Islamic Congress had charged Maclean’s with inciting hatred and contempt towards Muslims when it published an excerpt from Mark Steyn’s America Alone, in which he advanced various xenophobic warnings about jihadists taking over the world. Much hand-wringing followed, as the media proclaimed that the media should be left to do as it pleases.

In its decision, the B.C. tribunal — and if they wanted to raise the spectre of totalitarianism, they couldn’t have done better than by calling themselves a “tribunal” — declared that “The article may attempt to rally public opinion by exaggeration and causing the reader to fear Muslims, but fear is not synonymous with hatred and contempt.” I’m inclined to agree with Andrew Coyne that this bit of casuistry was just the members’ way to avoid enforcing B.C.’s human rights law. Whether Steyn’s article incites fear or hatred depends on the incitee, it seems to me; maybe it’ll cause wimps like me to flee from the nearest brown-skinned person, but your average good ol’ boy might react differently.

Still, except for one genuinely hateful paragraph, in which he links some teenagers’ violence to their North African background, Steyn’s article is soft soap. As usually happens when he cares about a subject, he ceases to be funny. And without the disarming laughs, Steyn is — here, at least — revealed as a common coin hysteric, even claiming at one point that Japan’s declining birth rate means it’s “likely to be the first jurisdiction to embrace robots and cloning and embark on the slippery slope to transhumanism.”

The CIC’s critics were right — dragging this stuff into court was unnecessarily heavyhanded.

Then again, I would say that. I’m white. And so are almost all the people running Maclean’s. And so are most of the journalists wringing their hands. But do you think if we were, say, Arab or South Asian or Trinidadian we might feel differently? D’ya think?

Maclean’s waxing about freedom of the press and creeping fascism and whatnot would be a lot more convincing if they could point to a few more non-Anglo Saxons on the masthead. Then we’d know that they know the marketplace of ideas isn’t just for the majority, and we’d know they have a genuine marketplace of ideas happening in their newsroom. Frankly, I don’t really care what Ken Whyte or Andrew Coyne has to say about the CIC suit; it’s all too predictable. What I would like to know is what their Features editor, Sarmishta Subramanian, has to say. (Has Subramanian commented on it? If so, I couldn’t find it.)

Similarly, Ian Mulgrew’s grumblings in The Vancouver Sun aren’t nearly as pertinent as Haroon Siddiqui’s analysis in The Toronto Star — not only because Siddiqui is liable to have the more nuanced view, but because The Star‘s hiring actually reflects Canadian multicultural reality. They’ve earned the right to an opinion.

This skirmish is a heads up for Maclean’s and all its journalistic brethren who are behind the curve. Time to change up their staffs to look more like the country they cover. Then maybe next time Steyn writes one of his nativist screeds they’ll decide to pass on it — not because they’re self-censoring, but because they can’t stop laughing long enough to get it into print.

Filed Under: Media Tagged With: Andrew Coyne, Canada, Canadian Islamic Congress, journalism, Kenneth Whyte, Maclean's, magazines, Mark Steyn, newspapers, Vancouver Sun

Subscribe to BoB by e-mail or RSS

Comments

  1. kaine says

    10/20/2008 at 7:33 pm

    On racial issues, the discounting of every white’s opinion while presenting any non-white’s opinion as automatically credible is itself racist.

    Racism occurs among individuals of every race and culture with no exceptions. It is the content of the argument, not skin color that should be heeded.

    Distrusting whites merely because they’re white makes no more moral sense than did discrediting all blacks in a previous age.

    Case in point, Haroon Siddiqui of the Star and the word “nuanced” should not appear in the same sentence.

  2. Anonymous says

    10/20/2008 at 4:07 pm

    I’m a woman but I do think men can write very well about our circumstances. In fact, many of the best insights I have read about female life are written by men. I never want to read an opinion because of the writer’s sex.
    Even MCPs allow me to look at their views and find some kernels of truth from their ranting. Truth hurts and the unsayable hurts too.
    This blog offers the type of opinion that is well meaning and inclusive but oh so Eighties.

  3. Single Lane Media says

    10/18/2008 at 7:27 pm

    To Anonymous #2: Our ads are automatically served by Google, based on words appearing on that particular page, as well as the reader’s location.

  4. Ted S. says

    10/18/2008 at 6:12 am

    If you really believe what you wrote, Mr. Frank “I’m white” Moher, you are welcome to remove yourself from the media and give your position to Sarmishta Subramanian at any time on the grounds that your ethnicity disqualifies you from representing the “genuine marketplace of ideas”. (“Genuine” meaning whatever is the identity fashion of the moment, apparently.)

    You won’t, naturally, perhaps because the Cause needs people like you despite your being the opposite of the principles you claim to represent, or some such Gore-esque excuse.

    The real reason, of course, is that you don’t really believe what you wrote and you are just a careerist representing the majority view of the media multiculturalists.

    “The marketplace of ideas isn’t just for the majority.” This is the one thing we agree on. But then you go to say that not everyone has “earned the right to an opinion.” Very Kim Jong-il of you.

    Perhaps when the government launches a Right To An Opinion Tribunal we will be spared all this confusion about who may and who may not have an opinion. At least Kim Jong-il is clear ahead of time about who is allowed an opinion. You just make it up as you go along. Or have you already prepared a list of whose opinions are allowed and whose are not? If so, I’d like to see it. Just in case you become a Tribunal member or something.

  5. Helen says

    10/18/2008 at 5:53 am

    Gee, you sound to me like a typical left wing white apologist who blames whitey for all the ills of the world. How extremely racist you are. Perhaps some good ol’ boy should haul you before a human rights commission for trying to incite hatred towards him.

  6. Anonymous says

    10/17/2008 at 4:33 pm

    Uh…. I found the book to be extremely funny.

  7. Anonymous says

    10/17/2008 at 4:32 pm

    Wow, your article is surrounded by adverts for muslima.com and singlemuslim.com.
    Bias much?

  8. Anonymous says

    10/17/2008 at 4:31 pm

    “…even claiming at one point that Japan’s declining birth rate means it’s “likely to be the first jurisdiction to embrace robots and cloning and embark on the slippery slope to transhumanism.”

    I swear to you that as I was reading this article I was listening to a piece on television about the elderly of Japan purchasing “robotic grandchildren” that they could tend to as if they were real.
    Score another one for Steyn.

  9. Doc says

    10/17/2008 at 11:11 am

    OK, so let me get this straight: you only said what you said because you’re white (actually I assume you’re more of a pinkish color)? So, if McLeans got someone who wasn’t white, or at least was less pink, to comment on Steyn that would be…better? How? Wouldn’t they only say what they said because they WEREN’T white?

    This is what passes for reasoned discourse on the left, I fear: identity politics. “You only said [fill in the blank] because you’re white/Christian/US citizen/Republican/gun owner/rich/whatever”, this implying, of course, that whatever was actually said isn’t true, just self-serving.

    Of course the opinions people express MAY be influenced by “self-servingness” (blech), but it is incumbent on the one claiming that this is so to at least give some evidence that what was said isn’t actually true. If EVERYTHING one says is because one is whatever one is (leftist/rightist/Christian/atheist/blogger/butcher/baker/Indian chief), then no statement is actually true, is it? In fact, I think you only said that you would say what you said because you were white, because you’re a brainless lefty. How’s that for reasoned discourse, eh?

Google+
  • Living
  • Politics
  • Media
  • Culture
  • Arts and Books
  • Features
  • The Video
Fire sale sign

Fort McMurray: Shopping time!

By Brady Tighe We’re now officially in the aftermath phase of the northern Alberta wildfire crisis. The fire is long gone, and everyone with a home to return to is back in its … [Read More...]

Nathan Cullen

Electoral reform: Hashtag fresh thinking

By Alison@Creekside The most interesting and innovative idea to come out of the first meeting of the all-party Special Committee on Electoral Reform, or ERRE, was Nathan Cullen's suggestion, … [Read More...]

Trudeau on quantum computing

The Trudeau gush fest is getting old

By Jim Henshaw There have been several bewildered as well as angry accounts coming out of the USA lately about how little media time has been spent covering the Democratic Presidential Primary … [Read More...]

Rick Meyers in Nanaimo Pride Parade

My friend, Rick, at the Pride Parade

By Frank Moher On this dreadful day, I don't want to write about the shootings in Orlando. I want to write about my friend, Rick. Rick lives just outside of Nanaimo, a city of about 80,000, … [Read More...]

Stephen Colbert on Late Night set

Triumph of the drama nerds

By Frank Moher Two drama nerds have recently moved into high profile positions. Before I name them (or perhaps you’ve already guessed who they are; or perhaps you’d like to scroll down and look at … [Read More...]

From “Our Rape Blog”: Shooting the Moon

Originally published on Our Rape Blog, the author's account of the aftermath of a violent sexual assault. By Mary Fraughton Have you ever played Hearts? It’s a card game. For our purposes, … [Read More...]

First Nations defending Lelu Island

The video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”

From Creekside: The B.C. provincial government is trying to green light the construction of a massive LNG terminal on Lelu Island in the Skeena Estuary -- Pacific Northwest LNG, backed by Malaysian … [Read More...]

Google

Follow Us!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

RSS CBC News



Recent Posts

  • Fort McMurray: Shopping time!
  • From “Our Rape Blog”: Shooting the Moon
  • Electoral reform: Hashtag fresh thinking
  • The fish hotel
  • Hatred on an Alberta golf course
  • The video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”
  • My friend, Rick, at the Pride Parade
  • Our selective sympathy
  • The Water Bomber, The Frogman and The Great Canadian Novelist
  • Komagata Maru: The story behind the apology

Tags

9/11 Afghanistan Alberta bad behaviour books British Columbia business Canada Canadian military Canadian politics CBC celebrity computers Conservatives crime environment family film G20 Globe and Mail internet Jason Kenney journalism Justin Trudeau law Liberals Maclean's music National Post NDP newspapers oil sands online media Ontario Quebec RCMP religion sports Stephen Harper television theatre Toronto U.S. Vancouver women

Archives

The Video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”

Pages

  • About
  • Privacy

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in