Canada's online magazine: Politics, entertainment, technology, media, arts, books: backofthebook.ca

Politics, tech, media, culture and more, from a Canadian point-of-view

  • Politics
  • Media
  • Culture
  • Science and Tech
  • Living
  • Arts and Books
  • Features
  • The Video
You are here: Home / Science and Tech / Copyright bill gives big media control

Copyright bill gives big media control

06/02/2010 by backofthebook.ca Leave a Comment

By Eric Pettifor

mickeybars
A new copyright bill has been introduced into parliament today, Bill C-32. I nearly wrote “anti-copyright” bill because, while I like the original idea of copyright, most of what governments have done to it in recent decades has been to its detriment.

The idea behind copyright was that all creative works belong in the public domain. There is no so called “intellectual property,” that being a weasel term to try and get people to believe that copyright means ownership. It doesn’t.

The concept of copyright was created to grant creators of original works a limited duration monopoly on those works to serve as both reward and incentive to create further works. It was not created in order to allow Disney to make millions off of a cartoon rodent in perpetuity, nor to similarly allow other corporate conglomerators of media to live fat off of old stuff — that’s totally opposed to the original intent of actually encouraging the creation of new stuff.

From the sound of it, this new bill could be worse than it is. It doesn’t add yet another extension to the term of copyright, doesn’t add more levies to media or players of media (though the blank CD levy remains in place), it does explicitly recognize some fair use concerns, such as creating not-for-profit “mashups” from copyrighted works, as well as allowing format transfer, time shift, and backup (not that the current law necessarily disallows these).

The major downside to the bill is that it seeks to protect digital restriction management schemes (DRM, or “digital locks”) from being broken. DRM is a flawed idea which hands all control over the media to the copyright holder (or, let’s get real, to the media corporation, since generally creators of “DRM worthy” content do not retain the copyright and should be grateful for whatever crusts the corporation throws). In some cases this would render the positive aspects of the bill moot. What good is the right to be able to transfer your content from one media to another if the original media contains DRM which prohibits copying? If you crack the DRM in order to exercise your rights under the law you will be breaking the law. Or as Michael Geist puts it:

The foundational principle of the new bill is that anytime a digital lock is used, it trumps virtually all other rights. This means that both the existing fair dealing rights and Bill C-32’s new rights all cease to function effectively so long as the rights holder places a digital lock on their content or device.

DRM is flawed in so many ways it would take an entire series of articles to go over, so I’ll simply point to this rather extensive “briefing” by Cory Doctorow, and encourage you to google if you want more, because there’s lots out there.

The only other point I’ll emphasize because it is so incredibly relevant to the original concept of copyright is that some forms of DRM which require connection to server to grant access are essentially a kill switch on your content. When that server is no more, because the company folds or decides it’s no longer worth its while — bye bye content. Unless, that is, you crack the DRM, but under this law that would be illegal. Again, this is your content — public domain once the limited monopoly expires. If anything, we need legislation against locking people out of what should eventually be theirs (or with the current law, their kids’ or grandkids’).

The only reform that Canadian copyright law requires is a shortening of the duration of copyright back to original levels. People need to wake up to the bullshit of “intellectual property,” demand that copyright represent a limited monopoly as originally intended, realize that ultimately, beyond that limited monopoly, this stuff is all OUR property, and tell anyone who tries to put locks on it to piss off. You can find the contact information for your MP here. At least email, but be aware that hand written letters may make a stronger impression.

Copyright law as it exists currently is not worthy of our respect. The law this new bill proposes is even less so.

Mickey and Goofy in Copyright Jail

Filed Under: Science and Tech Tagged With: Bill C-32, Canada, copyright, digital restriction management, digital rights management, DRM, intellectual property, Michael Geist

Subscribe to BoB by e-mail or RSS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Google+
  • Living
  • Politics
  • Media
  • Culture
  • Arts and Books
  • Features
  • The Video
Fire sale sign

Fort McMurray: Shopping time!

By Brady Tighe We’re now officially in the aftermath phase of the northern Alberta wildfire crisis. The fire is long gone, and everyone with a home to return to is back in its … [Read More...]

Nathan Cullen

Electoral reform: Hashtag fresh thinking

By Alison@Creekside The most interesting and innovative idea to come out of the first meeting of the all-party Special Committee on Electoral Reform, or ERRE, was Nathan Cullen's suggestion, … [Read More...]

Trudeau on quantum computing

The Trudeau gush fest is getting old

By Jim Henshaw There have been several bewildered as well as angry accounts coming out of the USA lately about how little media time has been spent covering the Democratic Presidential Primary … [Read More...]

Rick Meyers in Nanaimo Pride Parade

My friend, Rick, at the Pride Parade

By Frank Moher On this dreadful day, I don't want to write about the shootings in Orlando. I want to write about my friend, Rick. Rick lives just outside of Nanaimo, a city of about 80,000, … [Read More...]

Stephen Colbert on Late Night set

Triumph of the drama nerds

By Frank Moher Two drama nerds have recently moved into high profile positions. Before I name them (or perhaps you’ve already guessed who they are; or perhaps you’d like to scroll down and look at … [Read More...]

From “Our Rape Blog”: Shooting the Moon

Originally published on Our Rape Blog, the author's account of the aftermath of a violent sexual assault. By Mary Fraughton Have you ever played Hearts? It’s a card game. For our purposes, … [Read More...]

First Nations defending Lelu Island

The video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”

From Creekside: The B.C. provincial government is trying to green light the construction of a massive LNG terminal on Lelu Island in the Skeena Estuary -- Pacific Northwest LNG, backed by Malaysian … [Read More...]

Google

Follow Us!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • RSS
  • Twitter

RSS CBC News



Recent Posts

  • Fort McMurray: Shopping time!
  • From “Our Rape Blog”: Shooting the Moon
  • Electoral reform: Hashtag fresh thinking
  • The fish hotel
  • Hatred on an Alberta golf course
  • The video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”
  • My friend, Rick, at the Pride Parade
  • Our selective sympathy
  • The Water Bomber, The Frogman and The Great Canadian Novelist
  • Komagata Maru: The story behind the apology

Tags

9/11 Afghanistan Alberta bad behaviour books British Columbia business Canada Canadian military Canadian politics CBC celebrity computers Conservatives crime environment family film G20 Globe and Mail internet Jason Kenney journalism Justin Trudeau law Liberals Maclean's music National Post NDP newspapers oil sands online media Ontario Quebec RCMP religion sports Stephen Harper television theatre Toronto U.S. Vancouver women

Archives

The Video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”

Pages

  • About
  • Privacy

Copyright © 2021 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in