Canada's online magazine: Politics, entertainment, technology, media, arts, books: backofthebook.ca

Politics, tech, media, culture and more, from a Canadian point-of-view

  • Politics
  • Media
  • Culture
  • Science and Tech
  • Living
  • Arts and Books
  • Features
  • The Video
You are here: Home / Politics / Jim Abbott explains why torture is okay

Jim Abbott explains why torture is okay

03/20/2010 by backofthebook.ca Leave a Comment

By Alison@Creekside

jim-abbottBack in 2007 the Cons claimed that the Geneva Conventions do not apply in Afghanistan because we are not officially at war with Afghanistan. On Tuesday in the Afghan parliamentary committee, Con MP Jim Abbott attempted to resuscitate that position.

Appearing as a witness before the committee, Paul Champ, human rights lawyer for Amnesty International and the BC Civil Liberties Association, advised that the UK suspended detainee transfers in June, 2009.

If the Brits still think the risk of torture is too great, he asked, why does Canada think it’s safe — particularly in light of the 2009 report from the US State Dept., dated March 11, 2010, regarding continuing reports of detainees being beaten, subjected to elecric shocks, etc?

Hawn asked whether it is appropriate to impose Canadian standards on Afganistan.

Champ : “Prisoners in Canadian corrections facilities are not subjected to electric shocks or beaten with electrical cables or hung up for days.”

Dosanjh : “Are you suggesting that we as Canadians, the Canadian government in particular, with the evidence before us, are in breach of our obligations vis a vis the Geneva conventions?”

Champ : “Yes and also the convention against torture and human rights.”

Dosanjh : “Is it your view that the government of Canada today, if taken to court, would be likely to be found in breach of international obligations?

Champ : “I do . . . Prohibition against torture is a non derogable duty.”

Abbott : “Dosanjh’s question is irresponsible. Would you agree with me that the Geneva convention does not apply in Afghanistan because it is not a state-to-state conflict, and would you further agree you were worried that we could be, or soldiers could be, subject to laws under the Geneva convention. And considering that it doesn’t apply, would you agree, why would you answer that irresponsible question with an irresponsible answer?

Champ : “I would disagree with you that the Geneva convention does not apply to the armed conflict in Afghanistan.”

Abbott : “Who was the other state?”

Champ : “You are quite right there’s some dispute whether it’s an international armed conflict or not, but, regardless, Common Article 3 — which is the duty not to subject individuals to inhumane or cruel treatment — that applies both in internal civil armed conflicts or international armed conflicts. So that applies regardless, and I think almost any lawyer would agree with me on that.”

Abbott : “Are you cherry-picking the Geneva convention?”

Champ : “No, I don’t think so. Common Article 3 applies in all conventions, 1,2, 3 and 4 . It’s the prohibition against cruel and inhumane treatment and I think any lawyer would agree with me that it applies in this conflict.”

There was more showboating from Abbott about docs leaked in the US “sending Osama bin Laden back to his caves” and “damage to soldiers from the complete public release of all docs” — which the unflappable Champ responded to by explaining that what is needed is a functioning system for dealing with all this and no one has suggested full scale public release of the docs and, for instance, he for one does not expect to see them.

Hawn opined that Champ is an employee of two orgs that are fighting our government, so it’s all just a partisan political witch hunt and we should move on to other matters.

Bachand reminded Hawn that the Cons boycotted the committee before Xmas and then prorogued for a month, so it’s pretty rich they now just want to move on, at which they all went “in camera” for a fight.

I do not see how we can “move on” as long as we have a government that does not believe in prohibitions against torture.

UPDATE : http://thegallopingbeaver.blogspot.com/2010/03/harper-conservative-jim-abbott-believes.html

Dave explains yet again why the Cons fiddling around with definitions of torture endangers the very troops they purport to champion as they hide behind them.

Filed Under: Politics Tagged With: Afghanistan, Canada, Canadian politics, Claude Bachand, Conservatives, Jim Abbott, Laurie Hawn, torture, Ujjal Dosanjh

Subscribe to BoB by e-mail or RSS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Google+
  • Living
  • Politics
  • Media
  • Culture
  • Arts and Books
  • Features
  • The Video
Fire sale sign

Fort McMurray: Shopping time!

By Brady Tighe We’re now officially in the aftermath phase of the northern Alberta wildfire crisis. The fire is long gone, and everyone with a home to return to is back in its … [Read More...]

Nathan Cullen

Electoral reform: Hashtag fresh thinking

By Alison@Creekside The most interesting and innovative idea to come out of the first meeting of the all-party Special Committee on Electoral Reform, or ERRE, was Nathan Cullen's suggestion, … [Read More...]

Trudeau on quantum computing

The Trudeau gush fest is getting old

By Jim Henshaw There have been several bewildered as well as angry accounts coming out of the USA lately about how little media time has been spent covering the Democratic Presidential Primary … [Read More...]

Rick Meyers in Nanaimo Pride Parade

My friend, Rick, at the Pride Parade

By Frank Moher On this dreadful day, I don't want to write about the shootings in Orlando. I want to write about my friend, Rick. Rick lives just outside of Nanaimo, a city of about 80,000, … [Read More...]

Stephen Colbert on Late Night set

Triumph of the drama nerds

By Frank Moher Two drama nerds have recently moved into high profile positions. Before I name them (or perhaps you’ve already guessed who they are; or perhaps you’d like to scroll down and look at … [Read More...]

From “Our Rape Blog”: Shooting the Moon

Originally published on Our Rape Blog, the author's account of the aftermath of a violent sexual assault. By Mary Fraughton Have you ever played Hearts? It’s a card game. For our purposes, … [Read More...]

First Nations defending Lelu Island

The video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”

From Creekside: The B.C. provincial government is trying to green light the construction of a massive LNG terminal on Lelu Island in the Skeena Estuary -- Pacific Northwest LNG, backed by Malaysian … [Read More...]

Google

Follow Us!

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

RSS CBC News



Recent Posts

  • Fort McMurray: Shopping time!
  • From “Our Rape Blog”: Shooting the Moon
  • Electoral reform: Hashtag fresh thinking
  • The fish hotel
  • Hatred on an Alberta golf course
  • The video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”
  • My friend, Rick, at the Pride Parade
  • Our selective sympathy
  • The Water Bomber, The Frogman and The Great Canadian Novelist
  • Komagata Maru: The story behind the apology

Tags

9/11 Afghanistan Alberta bad behaviour books British Columbia business Canada Canadian military Canadian politics CBC celebrity computers Conservatives crime environment family film G20 Globe and Mail internet Jason Kenney journalism Justin Trudeau law Liberals Maclean's music National Post NDP newspapers oil sands online media Ontario Quebec RCMP religion sports Stephen Harper television theatre Toronto U.S. Vancouver women

Archives

The Video: Lelu Island: “They will come.”

Pages

  • About
  • Privacy

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in